What does Collaboration mean?
This involves two or three (perhaps more in appropriate
circumstances) schools staying as separate schools, with separate governing bodies, but usually sharing a headteacher. Another possibility would be for formal joint arrangements for some aspects of management
and/or curriculum delivery but retaining separate headteachers. The governing bodies retain their individual powers, as now,
but can if they wish decide to delegate certain functions to joint committees. Initially
at least, there does need to be a joint steering group of governors from all schools to hold the arrangement together, carrying
out some duties, working on policies to recommend to the individual governing bodies, and promoting the collaboration (or
confederation) to the community outside the schools.
It is important to note that each school within such a
collaborative arrangement or confederation would retain its own status and character.
The legal agreement allows for any school within such an arrangement to withdraw after giving an agreed period of notice.
One example of schools beginning to move in this direction
is St Peter’s, St Francis Xavier’s and St Mary’s in Doncaster. There is no rush and there are
no sacred cows! The aim is to gently explore the options with a view to forming
some form of formal arrangement for September 2006.
What does Federation mean?
This involves up to five schools (this can just be primary
schools or it can be a mixture of primary and secondary) coming together under one or more headteachers, but under one
governing body. A federation can include any or all categories of schools. Each school would retain its own status and character.
There are strict regulations on how such a governing body
would be formed, to ensure that representation of all communities involved is as it should be.
Any group which would be represented on an ordinary school governing body will be represented on the federated governing
body, which can vary in size between 9 and 20 members (or more if there is more than one headteacher)
Each school in the federation would continue to receive
a separate budget under the LMS formula BUT the federated governing body
could decide to pool these budgets, provided that they have fully documented financial structures in place and are able to
maintain an audit trail for each school budget.
Since there would be only one set of governing body meetings,
the decision making process under federation is simpler than under collaboration (or confederation), with the scope for faster
decision making.
The regulations allow for any school in a federation to
withdraw from the arrangements if it is not working satisfactorily, but this would be a far more complex arrangement than
withdrawal from a confederation agreement.
One example of schools beginning to move in this direction
is the Dearne Valley
cluster of St Helen’s Hoyland, St Michael & All Angels Wombwell, and Sacred Heart, Goldthorpe. Again, there is no rush and there are no sacred cows. The aim is to continue gently exploring the issues,
getting to know each other and each others schools better, with a view to entering into a federation in September 2006 or
2007. It is perhaps interesting to note that the three schools are now sharing
one priest!
What are the likely advantages
of collaboration or federation?
- Offers
opportunities for enriching the curriculum for children by staff sharing expertise and experiences across a number of schools
- May
produce savings on planning and administrative time, and assist in workforce remodelling
- Offers
the opportunity for joint staffing arrangements, including specialist teachers, wider career opportunities and broader staff
development and formation – helping us to “grow our own”
- Gives
scope for even higher quality, stability and parental confidence in an era with fewer Catholic children
- Enables
school communities to retain a distinctive Catholic curriculum by working together with other Catholic schools
- Is
cost effective – providing economies of scale
- Has
impact on the quality of education offered – OFSTED strongly supports links with other schools
- Offers
opportunities to resolve some of our current headteacher recruitment and retention difficulties. We believe we will not be able to sustain the number of schools we currently have in the future without
this strategy – the status quo is not an option!
What is happening in other
dioceses and in other parts of the country?
Some dioceses are starting to reduce the number of Catholic
schools they have due to the decline in the number of baptised Catholic children and because of increasing concerns regarding
the recruitment and retention of headteachers and deputy headteachers.
A small number of dioceses are moving in the same direction
as we are and are actively moving towards collaboration and federation.
All dioceses face similar challenges to our own diocese
of Hallam. In June, officers from all our 22 diocese in England
and Wales gathered at a national conference
with colleagues from the CES and the DfES to explore the implications of collaboration and federation. The conference also explored arrangements for collaboration and federation with Community and Church of
England schools. At the present moment the diocese of Hallam is seeking to encourage Catholic schools to explore collaboration
and federation with other Catholic schools and has no plans for other arrangements.
However, in September 2006, we will open our third joint Catholic / Church of England School.
Most LEA’s
are exploring collaboration and federation. In North Yorkshire a number of confederations
have been running for a number of years. Recent Ofsted inspections have judged these schools to be very good and the joint
arrangements a success. Three secondary schools have formed a confederated arrangement
to enable them to manage certain curricular and administrative functions more effectively.
A number of schools in other parts of the country, faced with either a current headship vacancy, or expecting one in
the next couple of years, are making enquiries.